pride_of_erin: (Default)
Erin ([personal profile] pride_of_erin) wrote2005-10-12 04:57 pm
Entry tags:

A smutty question for Smut Day

Okay, time to discuss smut in order to get my mind off the fact that I spent a half hour this afternoon cleaning shit off a three-year-old child who'd some how managed to smear it over virtually his entire body - ah, the joys of Early Childhood teaching. Why did I want this job again?

Anyhoo, on to the smut - recently, I've been pondering the very important and philosophical topic of topping. Namely, who should be doing the topping. Now this has become a question for me, in light of all the SGA fic I've read in recent months. Oz was my first ever fandom, and when it comes to smut in Oz fic, I really don't have a preference either way - Chris topping, Toby topping, it's all good. Of course I've always liked the smut scenes where the boys switch off and each have a turn the best, but either way is just fine with me. So I assumed that I would be like that with any fandom slash pairing I got obsessed with. But SGA has proved I'm not.

When it comes to SGA fic, I am a Rodney-on-top girl all the way. I have no idea why this is. Perhaps because the very first one I ever read had Rodney topping, but I don't think so. It's really quite strange, and very annoying because I can't figure out why I feel this way. Don't get me wrong - I enjoy John-on-top fics just fine, but there's always a moment when a voice in my head says, 'Oh damn, why couldn't they have put Rodney on top?' before I get too immersed in the *guh* to care.

So now I'm curious - what 'topping' do my Oz and SGA peeps prefer on their B/K and/or McShep 'desserts'? Please leave me a comment so I can satisfy my curiosity.
ext_1239: The Clarkson in Botswana, wearing many beads ((You smell) sexy)

[identity profile] kitestringer.livejournal.com 2005-10-12 11:25 am (UTC)(link)
Of course, I'm quite happy with well-written stories that have any of those guys on top, but I have a slight preference for Chris on top and Rodney on top. I think my preferences probably have to do with what I find more plausible. I can see all of those guys topping at least some of the time, but I suppose I imagine Chris being the sort of guy who would just end up on top more frequently (he's naturally very aggressive, likes to feel in control, etc.), and I imagine Rodney having more hang-ups and insecurities about conventional gender roles (not to mention the possibility of pain, LOL). I can see all of them being reasonably flexible in their preferences, though.

Mmmmm...a nice thing to think about first thing in the morning. *g*

[identity profile] pride-of-erin.livejournal.com 2005-10-12 11:33 am (UTC)(link)
(not to mention the possibility of pain, LOL).

Hee! Never thought of that perspective, but, yes that is so Rodney! Like, "Ow! Would it kill you to be considerate and remember that I also have to use my ass for sitting in the morning?" *snicker*.
ext_8622: (sga himie? the asgard)

[identity profile] dustandroses.livejournal.com 2005-10-12 01:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh man, you just made me spit all over my monitor! You evil woman, you! Bwah hah hah hah... I feel better, now.

[identity profile] blackchaps.livejournal.com 2005-10-12 12:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I have a definite preference for Chris on top. Every time I envision Toby on top, that vein of his is popping out and he looks more than a little furious. I also think it has something to do with all of Chris's other affairs - he was definitely the bitch in charge. I also write Star Trek, and for some reason, I prefer Spock on top, which is not only fun to say, but not as likely as Kirk on top. Happy Smut Day - I love this day.
ext_8622: (st spock fuck me)

[identity profile] dustandroses.livejournal.com 2005-10-12 01:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I prefer Spock to top, too. But I always saw Spock as more Alpha than Kirk, despite the whole "Slut of the Galaxy" thing Kirk had going on.

Heh heh heh...Spock on top. It sounds like something by Dr. Seuss.

Yea, Smut Day! Let's spread the love smut!

[identity profile] pride-of-erin.livejournal.com 2005-10-13 06:59 am (UTC)(link)
Hmm, there is a lot of Toby-on-top, angry sex fics out there, so I guess you have a point. But I can imagine Chris being just as capable of topping from the bottom as he is from the top - Hee! ;-)
ext_8622: (sga john watches ronon)

[identity profile] dustandroses.livejournal.com 2005-10-12 01:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I totally agree with Kitestringer about Keller. Chris is just naturally agressive, and although I can see him easily enjoying the bottom role, because he's just into sex, I can also see him needing to be in control. It just makes sense.

At the beginning, all the people writing McShep were writing McKay as the bottom, but once his character began to grow and become more complex, more and more writers wrote McKay topping. And I can see the arguments for McKay, but I don't necessarily prefer him in one position or the other. As a character, personally, I prefer John to McKay, but that doesn't influence me a whole lot.

I love Power Games, and think they're even more interesting when the expected dynamic is reversed. So I really like to see the one you would think of as the more dominant partner as the bottom, just because it's not what you would expect, so it's different and more exotic. For instance, I love to see Jack as a bottom to Daniel on SG-1. But there are exceptions to that rule. I prefer to see Chris Keller as a top. And on NCIS, I definitely see Gibbs topping DiNozzo, and Gibbs is most definitely the Alpha in that relationship.

Since Ronon showed up on SGA, I've become quite a fan of his. So at the moment, my SGA OTP is John/Ronon. But despite his size and skill as a fighter, I really like seeing Ronon as the bottom in that relationship. Actually, I really like the idea of Ronon being into Power Games, and taking a sub role, and having to almost force John into the Dom role, because I can see John as having a little trouble with that role to begin with. As a matter of fact, as soon as I get through with the forty-million fic I already have promised to write, that particular fic is on my list of what to write next! (Sigh...we're talking way down the line, here...)

[identity profile] pride-of-erin.livejournal.com 2005-10-13 07:07 am (UTC)(link)
Hmmm, maybe power games are why I prefer Rodney-on-top - I like the idea of a needy, begging John, because he's so in control everywhere else, whereas Rodney is usually hysterical and out of control, so I like him being in charge. Hmmmmmm...something to ponder, anyway.

Unfortunately, I can't make any judgements on Ronon, having not seen S2 of SGA yet (Grrrr!), but I can imagine John having to be coaxed into the dom role - and I will definitely be reading that fic when it evenuates! :)
callmeri: wwx and lwj smiling at the end of The Untamed (Awesome comicon by Pirl!)

[personal profile] callmeri 2005-10-12 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Me, I like 'em all as switch hitters. Maybe it's because the characters themselves, canon-ically speaking, are all actually straight (or at least bisexual, in Keller's case), so I have a hard time believing that any of them would want to bottom exclusively.

There's a scene in Gwen's "Nine Tenths of the Law" where Toby confronts Chris about the subject, saying that he loves to bottom for Chris, but it can't *always* be that way, and that rings really true for me. I think Toby would want that, and I think Keller doesn't care either way. In his past "relationships" I could see Keller as a dominant top, but with Toby, I think he plays a different role, at least some of the time, because he would know Toby would need that (hence his staying on the bottom bunk in their pod).

As far as McKay/Sheppard... I have to admit, I was a little surprised to see so much McKay-topping in the fandom. Rodney, to me, is definitely a "topping-from-the-bottom" kind of guy. But when a writer can make Rodney-topping work within the context of her story, it's even hotter because of the surprise, so I'm all for it. *g*

[identity profile] pride-of-erin.livejournal.com 2005-10-13 07:25 am (UTC)(link)
*Nods*, Good point about Toby - although I have no preference for Chris or Toby on top, the fics where Toby bottoms exclusively never really ring true for me.

I also wasn't expecting Rodney-toppage in SGA fics, since John's so stereotypically 'alpha male', but I love him as a top. I think he can be a 'topping-from-the-bottom' guy too (that scenario has made for some lovely fics, *g*), but I actually tend to see John more along those lines! :D

[identity profile] doctorevel.livejournal.com 2005-10-12 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Interesting question... I tend to agree with Kite that I like Keller on top most of the time. But I really like fiction (like your fic with the chair) where Toby takes the initiative to try something new or where Chris lets Toby top as a needed act of surrender.

[identity profile] pride-of-erin.livejournal.com 2005-10-13 07:30 am (UTC)(link)
where Chris lets Toby top as a needed act of surrender.

Ooh, I like those fics too - I love the idea of Keller's obsession giving Toby the power to bring him to his knees (er...figuratively speaking) the way no-one else has ever done before. Chris may have been Schillinger's prag, but he never really 'bent over' for anybody until he fell for Toby.

[identity profile] doctorevel.livejournal.com 2005-10-13 03:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, I totally agree. And that gives me a great idea for a fic request for Oz Magi.... :)

[identity profile] rileyc.livejournal.com 2005-10-12 04:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Well it's canon that B/K took turns at bat, although I do lean toward Keller technically being more often on top -- while Toby tops from the bottom. And I think, for both of them, the positions are a tremendous deal.

One of the key Keller moments for me is when he tells Sister Pete he 'let' Vern take the power part of sex, back at Lardner. Key, because it was clear as day he was spinning that, had to spin it in his head so he wasn't a prag, wasn't a bitch. (The ultra buff, ultra butch *persona* is all part of that too, IMO; something he's worked at ever since Lardner so he would never wind up in that situation again.)

So Chris taking the more submissive role ranks as a very powerful moment, I think, especially there in Oz. And he only does it because it's Toby, who he loves and trusts (although in my head, that very first time is wrought with major angst).

And Toby, man, think about it: Schillinger raped him, repeatedly, so at that point all taking it up the ass means to him is pain and degradation. That's amazing too -- and something I always held onto whenever I was fretting about him not loving Chris enough -- that he is willing, ready, and *eager* ("I was hoping you'd say I looked fuckable.") to literally put his ass on the line with Chris.

For me, their relationship isn't about power; it's about love and trust, and learning to give, and that all being a two-way street.

[identity profile] pride-of-erin.livejournal.com 2005-10-13 07:50 am (UTC)(link)
It's amazing how much I totally agree with everything in your comment - did you steal my brain, or did I steal yours? LOL.

[identity profile] ralu-1982.livejournal.com 2005-10-12 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)
If I'm to be blunt about the whole top/bottom thing, I gotta say I personally enjoy fics in which the whole issue isn't even adressed. Top, bottom...who the hell cares?
But I must say that I rather go for fanfiction that actually doesn't completely ignore (and a lot of fic writers tend to do this) the fact that, at the end of the day, Beecher is straight and Keller...well, he's Keller. This particular element - the fact that Beecher is heterosexual and a NOT very well behaved prag - should matter to any fanfic writer, because I'm convinced it *matters* to Keller. I mean, why the hell does Keller go after Beecher in the first place, what drives him and makes him NOT perceive Beecher the way he apparently perceives other guys he's had sex with, the way he even perceives himself? This aspect of the relationship - the manner in which Keller sees Beecher within whatever it is they have - constitutes for me an important element that shouldn't be overlooked by fic writers just because Keller gives the impression he's "stronger" or more "aggressive". As it's easy to notice in the show, half the shit Keller says are lies and what he *shows* about himself is nothing more than a facade.
Then again, one has to consider the fact that the whole of Em City knows what they're doing, and who's doing what to whom, right? And I don't see neither Keller nor Beecher happily playing the *prag-part*.
I guess the best way to describe the relationship between Beecher and Keller is as a give-and-take partnership, just like a marriage. Of course there's gonna be frictions, there definitely ARE frictions, but it's only normal - there's too much bad shit between them and they're both a couple of *very* egotistical, self-centered and stubborn individuals. They're very much alike as they're different, and they deserve each other from this point of view.

And to answer your question Erin, there's way too much Keller-top-macho-"I'll take care of you baby, now roll over"/Beecher-bottom-"Oh, I love you sooo much, honey"-bullshit fanfic out there. And I definitely DO NOT see Toby doing Keller's laundry (who's laundry did he used to do?!...) while worrying about his girlish figure and looking good for his man...
Keller wouldn't look twice at Beecher if the guy would simply roll on his belly like a puppy. That's the catch with both of them, if you ask me.

[identity profile] pride-of-erin.livejournal.com 2005-10-13 08:07 am (UTC)(link)
Keller wouldn't look twice at Beecher if the guy would simply roll on his belly like a puppy.

Very true. And you're right, the top/bottom question doesn't really matter as long as the fic's well-written - but hey, sometimes I'm just shallow and wanna think about the hot sex, LOL.

And YAY! You got an LJ! I'm gonna go visit and add you to my friends list.

[identity profile] doctorevel.livejournal.com 2005-10-13 03:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Interesting observations but I'm not sure I buy that Beecher's "straight." Perhaps he's always leaned that way, but that my have had a lot to do with his socialization and the limitations thereof. Had been raised a different way with different experiences, I suspect he'd have been farther along on the spectrum. And now that his environment pushed him to a new realm -- where he was not only forced to have sex but craved it with Keller -- there's no totally going back. Would he choose women on the outside given the choice? Probably. But I wouldn't call him "straight." That's what Dori captured so perfectly in "Leroy Street" -- experience changes you permanently and there's just no going back. My two cents anyway!

And, BTW, I totally agree with that Keller-top-macho stuff... ugh!

[identity profile] rojimouse.livejournal.com 2005-10-13 07:48 pm (UTC)(link)
For me, the issue of top/bottom is pretty much secondary, like most people have already said. As long as the writer can make it believable, I'll believe any position.

That being said, I lean towards Keller on top with Beecher insecure about topping, pretty much like he is in your "New Loves, Old Tricks". What's more, I tend to think that maybe Beecher even wanted it that way sometimes, despite his past experience. I think Star wrote something of the sort in "Advocacy", a scene where Keller was fucking Beecher against a wall and he was taking command, and Toby found that sometimes he enjoyed, needed to give control to Chris. That it felt good to not be the one in charge. Given that he's pretty much the type to run from a problem rather than face (take his drinking problem), I find that credible.

I think I mentioned to you already, but I really get a jolly big kick out of the boys and a wall. The vertical fuck, you know. No bottom or top, in the actual sense, and neither should feel as vulnerable as in a horizontal position, the more typical position and one that both have a seriously disturbing past with. Or maybe I'm just kinky that way!*g*

[identity profile] pride-of-erin.livejournal.com 2005-10-14 06:43 am (UTC)(link)
*Snorts* - two boys and a wall...you're reading my mind again. *coughVegasficcough*. It also reminds me of Mav's 'Two Nekkid Boys and a Fence' - http://www.livejournal.com/users/maverick4oz/80025.html